This is a writ petition regarding an approval proposal for the petitioner's appointment. The court directed the respondent to decide the proposal on merits within four months.
The respondent was directed to decide the proposal on its own merits within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 7885.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7885 OF 2021
Pravin Rambhau Pawar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 23RD JULY, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proposal is filed by the petitioner for approval to his appointment.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/July 21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a time limit should be fixed for the approval of appointment proposal.
Pravin Rambhau Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
