Allowed

Lata Namdev Pendalwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC19 Jul 2021WP/7209/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, appointed on an unaided post and transferred to aided post after over three years of service, challenged phase-wise approval of aided status. Court set aside phase-wise approval directing 100% grant-in-aid confirmation.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order granting phase-wise approval set aside; petitioner directed to make transfer by year 2015–2020 at 100% grant-in-aid.

Lata Namdev Pendalwad Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

14 wp.7209.21.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶4

14 WRIT PETITION NO.7209 OF 2021

¶5

LATA W/O NAMDEV PENDALWAD VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Swapnil Patunkar, i/b J. P. Legal Associates. AGP for Respondent/State: Mrs. M. A. Deshpande.

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 19^th July, 2021.

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

. Issue notice to the Respondents. The learned AGP accepts notice for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3.

¶11

2 The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is appointed on an unaided post on 3^rd July, 2009. The appointment of the petitioner on the unaided post is approved under the order dated 28^th July, 2010. On 1^st September, 2015 the petitioner is transferred to the aided post. The Deputy Director of Education has approved the transfer of the petitioner to the aided post, but on 40% from the year 2015-16 i.e. in a phase wise manner.

¶12

3 The said approval in the phase wise manner has been granted on the basis of circular dated 28^th June, 2016.

¶13

¶14

14 wp.7209.21.odt

¶15

4 This Court in its judgment and order dated 4^th July, 2019 in Writ Petition No.1493 of 2018 with connected writ petitions, held that if the employee has rendered service more than three years on unaided post and is transferred to 100% grant-in-aid post, then the approval has to be granted on 100% grant-in-aid.

¶16

5 In light of the above, the impugned order to the extent of granting approval to the petitioner in phase wise manner is set aside.

¶17

6 The Deputy Director of Education shall confirm that the transfer of the petitioner on aided post is 100% grant-in-aid. If the Deputy Director of Education comes to the conclusion that the post on which the petitioner is transferred to the aided division was on 100% grant-inaid, then the approval shall be granted to the petitioner on 100% grantin-aid. The said exercise shall be done expeditiously, preferably within four months.

¶18

7 The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]

¶20

nga

Lata Namdev Pendalwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lata Namdev Pendalwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ambika Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Bhagwat Keshelal Pardeshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dnyanoda Bhagwat Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Snehal Ravindra Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babanrao Dattatraya Lonikar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anand Balwantrao Krishnapurkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Gulab Yashwant Deshmukha and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Principal Secretary and Others