Petitioner sought direction to allot a fair price shop without consulting the Women Gram Sabha. The Court dismissed the petition, observing that the impugned order had already been challenged in a separate pending writ petition before the Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 7087.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1077 WRIT PETITION NO.7087 OF 2021
MATOSHRI JIJAMAY SEVABHAVI SANSTHA VADGAON THROUGH
ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY/MEMBERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Biradar R. D.
AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. R. Kale
Advocate for Intervenor: Mr. P. S. Dighe
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE:23rd JULY, 2021
PER COURT:
1.We have heard Mr. Biradar, learned Counsel
for the petitioner, the learned A.G.P. for the
respondents and the learned Counsel for
intervenor.
2.The petitioner is seeking directions to allot
the fair price shop to the petitioner without
sending the proposal to Women Gram Sabha. Reliance
is placed by the petitioner on the order dated
20.01.2021, thereby setting the Circular dated
15.01.2021 till 31.03.2021.
2 wp 7087.2021
3.It is submitted that the learned A.G.P. has
placed on record the order passed by the Deputy
Commissioner (Supply), Aurangabad dated 08.07.2021
wherein he has set aside the order dated
20.01.2021 passed by respondent no. 2 herein.
4.It is submitted that the petitioner has
already challenged the order i.e. 08.07.2021 by
filing a writ petition and the same is pending
before the learned Single Judge of this Court.
5. As the order passed by the Deputy
Commissioner (Supply), Aurangabad dated 08.07.2021
is already assailed by the petitioner by filing
the writ petition and the same is pending before
the learned Single Judge, it will be open for the
petitioner to raise all the points as raised in
the present writ petition in the writ petition
filed by the petitioner challenging the order
dated 08.07.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner
(Supply), Aurangabad.
3 wp 7087.2021
6.Keeping all points and contention of the
petitioner, the respondents and the intervenor
open, the present writ petition is disposed of
with the aforesaid observations. No costs.
marathe
Matoshri Jijamay Sevabhabi Sanstha Vadgaon
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court