Vijay Manohar Shinde v. the State Election Comission and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP44_2021
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
944 WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2021
VIJAY MANOHAR HHINDE VERHUH
THE HTATE ELECTION COMIHHION AND OTHERH
Mr. H.R. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Kadethankar, Htanding Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. H.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for respondent No.2 and 3.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. (Vacation Court)
DATE : 02nd January 2021
PER COURT:
petitioner submits, on instructions, that the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
vd_dhirde
VIJAY MANOHAR HHINDE
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court