Petitioner withdrew writ petition after a brief observation by the bench. The court disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Petition withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP42_2021
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 WRIT PETITION NO.42 OF 2021
LILABAI ANTIKRAO BAKAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THROUGH ITS SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND OTHERS
Mr. V.B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1,3,5 & 7. Mr. A.B. Kadethankar, Standing Counsel for resp. Nos.2 & 4.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. (Vacation Court)
DATE : 02nd January 2021
PER COURT:
petitioner submits, on instructions, that the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
vd_dhirde
Lilabai Antikrao Bakal
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
