Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous since the applicant was already arrested and granted regular bail by the Trial Court.
Application disposed off as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47.20abappln
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.47 OF 2020
Adinath s/o Walmik Gutte ..APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT
Mr P. K. Ippar, Advocate h/f Mr V. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant; Mr S. G. Sangle, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J
DATE : 14th December, 2020
PER COURT:
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
Adinath Gutte
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
