The petitioner, considering reasons for rejection of a nomination form and suppression of crime details, sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
930-WP-30-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 WRIT PETITION NO.30 OF 2021
RANJIT ASHOK BHALERAO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni Vaibhav B
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 5 & 6: Mr. R. D. Sanap
Standing counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 4: Mr. A. B. Kadethankar
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
(VACATION COURT)
DATE:02.01.2021
PER COURT :
1. Considering a reason for rejection of the nomination form
and the suppression of the crime details by the petitioner, the learned
advocate for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner
desires to withdraw this petition.
2.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as
withdrawn.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Sameer
1/1
RANJIT ASHOK BHALERAO
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court