A Criminal Writ Petition made under the Code of Criminal Procedure was disposed of as withdrawn after the learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the same.
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
56.WP-3282-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3282 OF 2021
Rajesh Mapara and another …. Petitioners Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another …. Respondents
Mr. Tejesh Dande, Advocate a/w. Bharat Gadhavi, Vishal Navale, Aniket Aghade, Trushna Shah, Chinmay Deshpande i/b. Tejesh Dande & Associates, for the Petitioners.
Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 11 OCTOBER 2021
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Petitioners state that the petitioners will avail of the statutory remedy available under the Code of Criminal Procedure and seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition.
Digitally signed PRADIPKUMARPRAKASHRAODESHMANE byPRADIPKUMARPRAKASHRAODESHMANEDate: 2021.10.12 14:36:41 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
1 / 1
Rajesh Mapara
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court