Nikhil Chandrashekhar Pandit and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The Petitioners pray for various reliefs. The learned counsel for the Petitioners has focused on the reliefs flowing out of their contention that the prosecution against the Petitioners was motivated and baseless. One of the reliefs is seeking damages. The genesis of seeking this relief is the order of discharge passed by the learned Magistrate which is annexed to the petition. The Petitioner has also annexed revision filed by the Government against the order of discharge. The petition contains no particulars as to what happened to the revision. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, however, orally states that the revision is also dismissed.

¶11

skn 2 38-WP-796.2021.doc

¶12

According to us, the prayer based on allegation of false investigation and based on the order of discharge was premature as the revision application of the State was pending. If there are subsequent events when the revision application is also dismissed, it is open for the Petitioner to file a proper petition. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty.

¶13

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Pandit and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Pandit and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaisingh Chorarai and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Chamanlal Hansraj Gupta and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Minaz Daud Shaikh and Ors. Vs Waseemuddin Shah Fazluddin Shah and Ors.

Mahendra Ravindra Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Madhuri Dattatray Whaval Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sachin Yelve and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra