Petitioner moved to withdraw the Writ Petition to seek quashing of FIR on merits instead of relying on consent. Respondent No.3 relieved from prior consent affidavit. Court disposed the petition with liberty as prayed.
Petition disposed with liberty as prayed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-WP-1758-21.odt
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1758 OF 2021
Shyamsundar Radhyesham Agrawal .... Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 11 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :
Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE V V NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date: 2021.10.13 14:42:42 +0530
The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petition was filed primarily on the ground that the Respondent/ complainant is agreeable for quashing of the FIR by consent. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has now received instructions to withdraw the Writ Petition and seek quashing of the FIR on merits.
Nesarikar
2 / 2 42-WP-1758-21.odt
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Writ Petition can be disposed of with liberty as prayed when proceeding on merits is sought.
Shyamsundar Radhyesham Agrawal
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
SARANG V. KOTWAL
NITIN JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court