The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a criminal application without examining merits because the applicant declined to seek it as a 'rarest of rare' case for quashing and indicated filing a separate application for discharge.
Application disposed of without examining merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2021
Deven Pratap Singh Lohmorh
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
... Respondents
Mr. Aarif Ali M. Ali for the Applicant Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 8 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :-
Having gone through the FIR and expressed that this is not a case that can be considered as rarest of rare case to fall within the ambit of the law governing quashing of the FIR by the High Court, the learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant will take necessary steps to approach the Court by filing an application for discharge.
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
JYOTI Digitally signed byJYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2021.10.12 PAWAR 11:31:57 +0530
Deven Pratap Singh Lohmorh
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
