Writ petitions seeking remedies against disqualification orders under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act were allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach other authorities after election results.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to avail of remedy as may be permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
wp2.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2021 YAMUNABAI SAHEBRAO MISAL VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 9 OF 2021
DWARKABAI LAXMAN KAVHALE VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 925 WRIT PETITION NO. 25 of 2021 ANNAPURNA DADAPATIL SHINDE VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 939 WRIT PETITION NO. 39 of 2021 BABURAO RAYAJI KHANDARE VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. Ravindra Nirmal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner in wp/39/21 Mr. D. R. Kale, AGP for the respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4 Mr. A. B. Kadethankar, Standing counsel for respondent No.2
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATE : 02-01-2021
P. C.
1 of 2
(2) wp2.21
the record made available with the petition paper book.
[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
VishalK/wp2.21
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
YAMUNABAI SAHEBRAO MISAL
DWARKABAI LAXMAN KAVHALE
ANNAPURNA DADAPATIL SHINDE
BABURAO RAYAJI KHANDARE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
