Petitioner withdrew the PIL petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VIDYA Digitally signedby VIDYASURESH AMIN SURESHAMIN Date:2021.08.1313:36:46+0530
13.PIL50_2021.docx
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 50 OF 2021
Navsu Chaudhary … Petitioner
vs.
Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Diu and Daman & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Chetan Mali for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Masurkar for the respondents.
C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : AUGUST 12, 2021
PC :
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Navsu Chaudhary
Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Diu and Daman & Ors.
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court