Allowed

Rajwardhan S/O Ishwardatta Metekar v. State of Maharashtra and Others.

Bombay HC5 Aug 2021WP/919/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed an order placing the petitioner on a supernumerary post due to pending validation proceedings. The court directed the respondent committee to decide the validation proceedings within three months and directed the petitioner to appear on a specific date.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order placing petitioner on supernumerary post was quashed and set aside; petitioner directed to appear by 06-09-2021.

Rajwardhan S/O Ishwardatta Metekar Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

.. 1 ..

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

1013 WRIT PETITION NO.919 OF 2021

¶4

RAJWARDHAN S/O ISHWARDATTA METEKAR .. Petitioner VERSUS

¶5

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .. Respondents

¶6

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Sunil M. Vibhute AGP for Respondents / State : Mr P.K. Lakhotiya

¶7

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

¶8

DATE : 05-08-2021

¶9

PER COURT : -

¶10

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, the validation proceedings is pending. The petitioner is placed on supernumerary post only on the ground that the validity certificate is not submitted. To get the proceedings decided within the stipulated period is not in the hands of the petitioner.

¶11

2.It is further submitted that, the vigilance is conducted. The
petitioner has filed reply to the vigilance report and hearing has also
taken place, but the orders have not been passed.

¶12

3.The Respondent / Committee shall endeavour to decide

¶13

the validation proceedings within three months from the date of
appearance of the petitioner.

¶14

Gajanan

¶15

.. 2 ..

¶16

4.The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on

¶17

06-09-2021.

¶18

5.The impugned order placing the petitioner on
supernumerary post during pendency of the validation proceedings is
quashed and set aside.

¶19

6.Respondent no.3 may take further course of action
depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the
Committee in the validation proceedings.

¶20

7.Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶21

[ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

Gajanan

Rajwardhan S/O Ishwardatta Metekar v. State of Maharashtra and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajwardhan S/O Ishwardatta Metekar v. State of Maharashtra and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kachru Marotirao Medhang Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dipali Shankar Muchate Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Omprakash Sheshrao Kalyankar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Manoj Pitambar Pardeshi Vs the Union of India and Others

Mukhtar Hussain Faiyaz Hussain Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Laxman Dasharath Chavan Vs the Union of India and Others