Disposed
Parimal Jagannath Bahalkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others
Bombay HCWP/7499/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1038. wp.7499.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
1038 WRIT PETITION NO.7499 OF 2021
PARIMAL JAGANNATH BAHALKAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G. D. Jain, h/f Mr. Vinod S. Khairnar Patil. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. K. Tambe.
Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 5: Mr. U. S. Mote.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 03rd September, 2021.
P.C.:
. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner had met
with an accident. The petitioner is not paid with the salary. The petitioner is disabled in the accident. The petitioner is also entitled for medical expenses and alternate employment.
2 The petitioner has already given application to respondent Nos.2 and 4.
3 Mr. Mote, learned counsel appears for respondent Nos.2 and 4 and further submits that the medical bills are already forwarded to the Civil Surgeon for consideration.
2
1038. wp.7499.21.odt
4 As far as the claim made in the application is concerned, the respondent No.2 may take decision on the application of the petitioner (page 210), preferably within six months.
5 In case, some compliance is required on behalf of the petitioner, the respondents may communicate to the petitioner and the petitioner may comply.
nga
Parimal Jagannath Bahalkar
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court