The High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding a pending refund application. Directing the respondent government to decide the pending application on merits within four months.
Respondent directed to decide pending refund application within 4 months; Writ Petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 9880.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
44 WRIT PETITION NO.9880 OF 2021
PARMESHWAR KISAN ANDIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Deshmukh Sachin S.
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE: 06th SEPTEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:
1.The learned Advocate for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has already approached
the State Government seeking refund of the amount.
The same is pending for 7 months.
2.The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for all the
respondents.
3.In case the application filed by the
petitioner (Page No. 30), is pending with
respondent no. 1, then respondent no. 1 shall take
decision upon it on it’s own merits, in accordance
with law and policy, preferably within a period of
four (04) months.
4.Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.
No costs.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parmeshwar Kisn Andil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court