Petitioners filed a PIL rendered infructuous due to subsequent events. The High Court disposed of the writ petition without costs.
The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.62 OF 2019
Dinkar s/o Bhagwanrao Ingle & anr.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The Union of India & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr A.N. Irpatgire, Advocate for petitioners; Mr Manish Navandar, Standing Counsel for respondent - Union of India
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 20, 2021
PC :
Mr A.N. Irpatgire, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits
that by reason of subsequent events, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
amj
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
Dinkar s/o Bhagwanrao Ingle & anr.
The Union of India & ors.
DIPANKAR DATTA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
