PIL petition regarding land acquisition was dismissed as infructuous because the land at issue was not notified for acquisition.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
3pil8o17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.8 OF 2017
GRAMPANCHAYAT SAVANGI THROUGH ITS UPA SARPANCH SHAIKH KADIR SHAIKH ABDUL RAHEMAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri S.S. Thombre AGP for the Respondents/ State : Mrs.M.A. Deshpande
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J.
&
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 21st January, 2021
P er Court : -
instructions, that this petition has become infructuous since the land at
issue has not been notified for acquisition.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
kps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the public interest litigation petition requires adjudication since the land in question was not notified for acquisition.
Grampanchayat Savangi through its UPA Sarpanch Sheikh Kadir Sheikh Abdul Rahman
State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Chief Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
