Cellebrite disposes of a PIL where the grievance is under consideration by respondent authorities, allowing withdrawal of deposited security without granting any relief beyond that.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw deposited sum of Rs. 2.00 lakhs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 107-PIL-43-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 43 OF 2020
Vijaykant Vikram Munde …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others …Respondents
Mr A.D. Gade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr D.R. Kale, Incharge Government Pleader for Respondent-State
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2021
PER COURT :
2 107-PIL-43-2020
[ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
mta
Vijaykant Vikram Munde
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
