Dismissed

Mr. Govind Sharadrao Ahankari, v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Aug 2021WP/2927/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition challenging a transfer order. As petitioner intended to comply with a fresh transfer order and withdraw the petition, the Court dismissed the claim ab initio as withdrawn and vacated the interim stay.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; the interim order was vacated.

Mr. Govind Sharadrao Ahankari, Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

VIDYASURESHAMIN Digitallysigned byVIDYASURESH AMINDate:2021.08.2414:28:29+0530

¶2

 2.WP2927_2018.docx

¶3

Vidya Amin

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2927 OF 2018

¶6

Govind Sharadrao Ahankari

¶7

… Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

Ms. Vaishali Jagdale for the petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4.

¶12

C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.

¶13

DATE : AUGUST 23, 2021

¶14

PC :

¶15

1. Ms. Jagdale, learned advocate for the petitioner,

¶16

submits that challenging an order of transfer, the petitioner had moved the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal initially and thereafter this Court. The order of transfer was stayed by this Court by an order dated March 13, 2018 and such order is continuing till date. During this time, a further transfer order dated August 9, 2021 has been issued to the petitioner and the petitioner wishes to comply with such transfer order by moving to the place of transfer. The petitioner, in such circumstances, does not intend to proceed with this writ petition and has, accordingly, instructed her to withdraw this writ petition.

¶17

¶18

 2.WP2927_2018.docx

¶19

2. The written instructions of the petitioner, contained in

¶20

his letter dated August 17, 2021, is taken on record.

¶21

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order stands vacated forthwith. No costs.

¶22

4. The petitioner shall be at liberty to comply with the order of transfer dated August 9, 2021.

¶23

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶24

Mr. Govind Sharadrao Ahankari, v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Govind Sharadrao Ahankari, v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shirish N.Polekar Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Indian Insti. of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, Thru Chair. Shekhar Bagool and Jt. Sec. Kaushal Ja Vs the City and Industrial Developement Corp. Ltd. and Ors.

Navsu Chaudhary Vs Administrator Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Diu and Daman and Ors.

Sundaram Home Finance Ltd. Thr. Amol Raghunath Sutar Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rajendra Sunil Bodke Vs Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd., and Anr.

Shri. Prabhakar Dagadu Buchade Thru Poa Mr. Kapil Prabhakar Buchade Vs Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd., and Ors.