The High Court disposed of two Public Interest Litigations (965-PIL-27-2015 and 966-PIL-55-2015) after the advocate for the petitioners submitted that the cause title and purpose of the litigation had been served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
965-PIL-27-2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
965 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.27 OF 2015
SANJAY BHASKARRAO KALE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Ms. P. S. Talekar h/f Mr. S. B. & U R Awate
Addl. GP for Respondents/State: Mr. P. S. Patil
966 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.55 OF 2015
SANJAY BHASKARRAO KALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. P. S. Talekar h/f Mr. S. B. & U R Awate
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. A. R. Kale
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 12.02.2021
P.C. :
.Ms. Talekar the learned advocate for the petitioners in
both PIL, on instructions, submits that the purpose of Public Interest
Litigation now stands served and nothing survives for adjudication.
2.In light of the above, both PIL stands disposed of.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Sameer
Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court