Rahamaniya Talimi Society Nilanga through Secretary v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
927-CA-1097-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1097 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7204 OF 2020
RAHAMANIYA TALIMI SOCIETY NILANGA THROUGH SECRETARY
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. G. Kodale h/f Mr. Gunale V.d.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 12.02.2021
P.C. :
.The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits
that by way of present application, the applicant/petitioner wants to
place on record the additional documents about the construction and
also add the averments. The learned counsel submits that he has
served the copy of the civil application to the learned advocate for
respondent No.4. Learned AGP appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3
and opposes the application.
2.The non-applicants will have every opportunity to
controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of
amendment.
2
927-CA-1097-2021.odt
3.For the reasons stated in the civil application, the civil
application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Necessary
amendment be carried out within 14 days.
4. Civil Application is disposed of.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Sameer
RAHAMANIYA TALIMI SOCIETY NILANGA THROUGH SECRETARY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court