Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 11 of 2020. The court granted leave and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, keeping all contentions open.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-PIL.11.2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 11 OF 2020
Hadapsar industrial Estate } Environmental Group } Petitioner versus The Pune Cantonment Board } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.C.D.Nargolkar i/b. Mr.Aumkar V. Joshi for the petitioner.
Mr.K.J.Presswala with Mr.D.J.Kakalia and Mr.Sandeep Goyal i/b. Mulla and Mulla and CB and C for respondent no.1.
Mr.R.S.Khadapkar for respondent no.2.
Ms.Sharmila Deshmukh for respondent no.3.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- FEBRUARY 17, 2021
PC :-
Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Leave granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. All contentions are expressly kept open.
Jayant V. Salunke
Digitally signed by Jayant V. Salunke Date: 2021.02.18 11:04:12 +0530
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Environmental Group
The Pune Cantonment Board
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
