The court disposed of P.I.L. No. 903 of 2021, observing that its subject matter is already covered by P.I.L. No. 96 of 2013, making the present petition unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.21 OF 2021
RAKESH CHANDRAKANT BRAMHANKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners :Mr Bramhankar Rakesh C. GP for Respondents: Mr D R Kale
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 10th February, 2021.
ORDER :
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
Rakesh Chandrakant Bramhankar
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
