This order dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Petitioner Aamshya Fulji Padvi. The Petitioner failed to deposit a court-directed amount despite multiple extensions and opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
971
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
971 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.24 OF 2015
AAMSHYA FULJI PADVI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Pawar Rahul S. AGP for Respondents State: Mr S K Tambe
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2021.
ORDER :
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
Aamshya Fulji Padvi
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
