PiL for failure to deposit court-directed amount. Petitioner failed to deposit sum within extended time despite multiple opportunities, leading to dismissal.
Public Interest Litigation is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
968
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
968 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.9 OF 2014
THANSING HARISING RAJPUT
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner :Mr Shinde Abasaheb D. AGP for Respondents State: Mrs V S Chaudhari Advocate for Respondent No.3: Mr L S Mahajan/Rahul S Pawar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2021.
ORDER :
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
THANSING HARISING RAJPUT
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
