Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. Court disposed of the matter on withdrawal. No costs.
Petition withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO.339 OF 2020
GORAKH KISAN PATHVE
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr S P Salgar h/for Gaware Niteen V. AGP for Respondents State: Mr. A. R. Kale Advocate for respondent No.2: Mr. S. T. Shelke Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. A. V.Hon,
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 10th February, 2021.
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
GORAKH KISAN PATHVE
THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
