High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction bench disposed of a criminal application by declining to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, directing applicants to pursue regular remedies under CrPC, which they agreed to, without further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-apl-555-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 555 OF 2021
Inder Kumar Vardani @ Varindani & Ors. ..Applicants. Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Dilip H. Shukla i/b. Yash Associates for Applicants. Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for State/Respondent.
__________ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 20 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :
. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the F.I.R. and documents annexed to the Application, when we expressed that the Applicants can approach the concerned court for availing of the regular remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure, as we are not inclined to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction, the learned counsel for the Applicants states that the Applicants be permitted to avail all the regular remedies. Keeping the contentions open, the Criminal Application is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2021.10.21 12:09:32 +0530
1 of 1
Gokhale
Inder Kumar Vardani @ Varindani & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court