is in the context of this limited issue that the Apex Court rendered its decision. We do not find from this decision that there is any comment as regards the nature of the ECIR, whether it needs to be supplied, whether it is the public document, whether it can be equated to the FIR under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned ASG has pointed out to us that this issue is now pending before the Apex Court. As far as the issue that is before us as to whether ECIR can be considered as the FIR and not an internal document, this issue has been addressed and directly decided by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Charu Kishor Mehta. In the case of Charu Kishor Mehta, a prayer was made to direct the Enforcement Directorate to supply the copy of the ECIR, and the Petitioner therein had moved at the stage of issuance of summons under Section 50 of PMLA. The Division Bench categorically observed that ECIR is an internal document of the Enforcement Directorate, and unlike FIR, it is not a public document. We, therefore, follow the decision of this Court in the case of Charu Kishor Mehta, wherein it is already held by the Division Bench that the ECIR cannot be considered as it is the FIR and a public document. Therefore, the contention of the Petitioner that the Respondents be directed to supply the copy of the ECIR in question to the Petitioner as being akin to an FIR cannot be accepted, and it is rejected. According to our respectful interpretation of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ashok Jain, the submission of the Petitioner that decision in the case of Charu Kishor Mehta is impliedly overruled cannot be accepted. Following the decision in
