Harishchandra Jagannath Kale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
1434 19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907 aba 1434 19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
907 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1434 OF 2019
HARISHCHANDRA JAGANNATH KALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Tandale Kakasaheb J. (absent)
APP for Respondent : Mr. S.W. Mundhe.
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE:14.01.2021.
PER COURT :
None is present for the applicant when the matter is called out in the
second session. Even in the morning session nobody was present.
2. It is a successive application for anticipatory bail. Earlier application bearing Anticipatory Bail Application No. 231/2018 was rejected by this Court on 07.06.2018.
3. In view of the above state of affairs, the application is rejected.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
HARISHCHANDRA JAGANNATH KALE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court