On 13.01.2021, the Bombay HC expressed disinclination to grant anticipatory bail. The applicant sought and was granted leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw; application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909ABA08.21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 08 OF 2021
SHAIKH ABRAR SHAIKH SHAMSHUDDIN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Joydeep Chatterji.
APP for Respondent : Ms. R.P. Gour.
Advocate for assist to APP : Mr. Shaikh Nasir.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 13.01.2021
PER COURT :
After hearing the arguments when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant anticipatory bail on merits, learned Advocate
for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the
application.
2. Leave is granted. Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
SHAIKH ABRAR SHAIKH SHAMSHUDDIN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court