In this anticipatory bail application, the court permitted the applicant's counsel to assist the A.P.P., and subsequently disposed of the application with no specific regular order or reasoning provided in the text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.70 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2021
(Waseem s/o Rauf Pathan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. Saeed S. Shaikh, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.W. Mundhe, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :13.01.2021
PER COURT:
Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the learned Advocate
for the applicant is permitted to assist the A.P.P. during hearing of
Anticipatory Bail Application No.4/2021. The application is accordingly
disposed of.
[MANGESH S. PATIL] JUDGE
npj/CRIAPLN70-2021
2 CRIAPLN70-2021
Waseem s/o Rauf Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court