Dismissed
Vinayak Rameshrao Tadse v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCABA/7/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2021 (Vinayak Rameshrao Tadse Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Mr. Pramod C. Mayure,Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.W. Mundhe, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :13.01.2021
PER COURT:
After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant and
learned A.P.P., when this Court expresses its disinclination to grant
anticipatory bail on merits, the learned Advocate for the applicant, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of as withdrawn.
[MANGESH S. PATIL]
JUDGE
npj/ABA7-2021
Vinayak Rameshrao Tadse
State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court