The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 61 of 2016, held sufficient having been worked out in a related PIL filed in 2016.
The petition was disposed of without substantive relief being granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-PIL-61-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2016
GAZI S. A. ANSARI VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Ajinkya Kale h/f Shri S. B. Talekar Advocate for Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Shri S. B. Deshpande
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 21st JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
of.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.)
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
SVH
1 of 1
Gazi S. A. Ansari
The Union of India
Others
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Debadwar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
