Petitioner sought writ relief regarding delayed decision on rental compensation for acquired land. Court directed respondents to decide the application within six months and disposed of the petition.
Respondents directed to decide petitioner's application for rental compensation within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.442 OF 2014
Babasaheb s/o Narahari Adale
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
& others
Respondents
Mr. D.A. Bide, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.
DATE : 20th January, 2020.
PER COURT :
( B. U. DEBADWAR ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) Judge Judge
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority should be directed to decide the petitioner's application for rental compensation for the period from 1985 to the date of the award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Babasaheb s/o Narahari Adale
The State of Maharashtra
B. U. Debadwar
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
