Sagar Kundalik Dalvi v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Department of Urban Development Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-PIL.134-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.134 OF 2019
SAGAR KUNDALIK DALVI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH IT’S SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI
Mr. D.B.Chavan, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.P.Sonpawale, AGP for respondent
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE
AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 20, 2020
PER COURT :-
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, prays for withdrawal of the P.I.L.
as withdrawn.
[ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. ]
kbp
SAGAR KUNDALIK DALVI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH IT'S SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI
PRASANNA B. VARALE
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court