Petitioner expressed lack of interest in proceeding writ petition due to subsequent developments. Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly without engaging merits.
Writ petition disposed of. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-WP-2033-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2033 OF 2014
BASAPPA CHANAPPA HAGALGUDE
VERSUS
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri M. P. Tripathi AGP for Respondent No.3 : Shri S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Shri S. D. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Smt. Jayashree Nawale h/f Shri V. D. Salunke
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 21st JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
subsequent developments, petitioner is not interested in prosecuting petition further.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
SVH
1 of 1
Basappa Chanappa Hagalgude
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Debadwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
