Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a previous court order. Respondent authorities submitted an affidavit confirming compliance and sought to be heard, which was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 914-cp-233-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 233 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 143 OF 2017
RBSK Contractual Medical Officer Union… Petitioner
Versus
Shri Pradeep Vyas and others… Respondents
Mr. A. S. More, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for the State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 18th OCTOBER, 2019
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present contempt petition is filed on a grievance of non
compliance of the order of this Court dated 09.01.2017. In response to
the notice issued by this Court, an affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of
respondent No.1 – Dr. Pradeep Vyas, Principal Secretary, Public Health
Department, State of Maharashtra. It is stated in the affidavit-in-reply
that the order of this Court is complied with. A copy of the decision
1 of 2
2 914-cp-233-18.doc
dated 31.08.2019 is placed on record. The learned AGP orally submits
that the delay caused in compliance of the order of this Court is due to
the administrative and procedural difficulties and the delay is purely
unintentional and bona-fide. The learned AGP thus submits, on
instructions, that respondent No.1 in particular and respondent
authorities in general would take appropriate care henceforth, to see
that the order of this Court is complied with within the time stipulated
period. The submission of learned AGP is accepted as an undertaking to
this Court.
3. As the order of this Court is now duly complied with, the grievance of the petitioner no more survives.
4. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ][ PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. ]
SMS
2 of 2
RBSK Contractual Medical Officer Union
Shri Pradeep Vyas
Prasanna B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court