Oral order where the court records that the petitioner complied with the previous order, resulting in the withdrawal and disposal of the contempt petition as withdrawn.
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.930 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2241 OF 2016
Archana Gopichand Meshram ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Nivedita Ved Singhal & others ... RESPONDENTS
Shri S.C. Swami, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for State
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 4th FEBRUARY, 2020
ORAL ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the order of this Court is now complied with and the grievance raised by the petitioner no more survives. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the Contempt Petition. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
fmp/-
Archana Gopichand Meshram
Nivedita Ved Singhal
Prasanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
