Contemis petition arising from a writ petition regarding State of Maharashtra order compliance. Court noted compliance by respondent. Petition dismissed as no cause remains after acceptance of compliance submission.
Contempt petition disposed of on grounds that impugned order has been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
669.19cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 669 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10722 OF 2016
Sanjay s/o Damodhar More, Age: 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 517, “Daiwayog”, Cantonment Chhavani, Aurangabad
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & ors
RESPONDENTS
Mr Amol N. Kakade, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent/State; Mr J.R. Shah, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2020
ORAL ORDER:
Mr. Shah, learned Counsel appearing for
respondent No.3 submits that the order of this Court dated 3rd April, 2019 passed in Writ Petition No.10722 of
2016 is complied with. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner admits and accepts submission of Mr. Shah, learned Counsel for respondent No.3.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
Sanjay s/o Damodhar More
The State of Maharashtra
Prashanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
