The High Court at Aurangabad allowed a petitioner's plea for withdrawal of the Contempt Petition No.517 of 2019 as the lower order was complied with, disposing of the matter as withdrawn during an oral hearing.
Contempt Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.517 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2430 OF 2014
Anil s/o Ramdas Thakur
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri Kalyan Patil, Advocate holding for Shri S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for State
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 4th FEBRUARY, 2020
ORAL ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the order of this Court is now complied with and the grievance raised by the petitioner no more survives. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the Contempt Petition. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
(R.G. AVACHAT) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/-
Anil s/o Ramdas Thakur
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
PRASANNA B. VARALE
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
