The Court disposed of writ petition 1024-wp-8147-2019. The matter was adjourned earlier due to petitioner's delay without explanation. The Court declined to pass any order on merits.
Petitioner permitted to prosecute representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1024-wp-8147-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1024 WRIT PETITION NO.8147 OF 2019
BALAJI RAMRAO BHOSALE
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Girish L. Awale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State.
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
PER COURT:-
1.On three earlier occasions, the matter is
adjourned at the request of the petitioner. The
petitioner has not explained about the delay and
latches. The petitioner claims to have filed
representation. The petitioner may prosecute his
representation as may be permissible in law.
2.We are not inclined to pass any order on
merits.
3.Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Devendra/September-19
Balaji Ramrao Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court