The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed this writ petition as it remained([none]) at the time of hearing after non-appearance by the petitioner. The accompanying civil application was also disposed of due to the dismissal of the writ.
Writ petition dismissed; civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1032-wp-3219-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1032 WRIT PETITION NO.3219 OF 2019
WITH CA/8322/2019 IN WP/3219/2019
JANARDHAN RAMRAO GAIAKE
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Milind A. Manjramkar, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
PER COURT:-
1.On 13.09.2019, we had passed an order that
if the matter is not worked out on the next date,
we would dismiss the matter.
2.Today, when the matter is called out, none
appears for the petitioner.
3.Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
4.In view of dismissal of writ petition,
civil application also stands disposed of.
(ANIL S. KILOR) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/September-19
JANDNAN RAMRAO GAIAKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ANOTHER [RESPONDENT NOT NAMED]
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court