Pandurang Manik Dahiphale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
949-ca-11122-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11122 OF 2019
IN WP/1402/2019
PANDURANG MANIK DAHIPHALE AND OTHERS ..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide, Advocate for the
Applicants.
Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondents-State.
… CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
PER COURT:-
1.Mr. Pulkundwar, learned A.G.P. and Mr.
Bide, learned counsel for applicants submit that
applicants have been issued with the reservation
certificates under the Home Guard Category.
2.In view of that, the purpose of the writ
petition stands served.
3.Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
4.In view of disposal of writ petition,
civil application also stands disposed of.
(ANIL S. KILOR) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/September-19
Pandurang Manik Dahiphale And Others
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court