Petitioner sought appropriate pay scale. Court directed respondent to decide merits within six months. Writ petition disposed of.
Directed respondent to decide within six months; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 86-WP-6339-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6339 OF 2019
KISHOR RANGANATHRAO KULKARNI
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.A. Joshi, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents-State
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
2 86-WP-6339-2019
the same is pending with the respondent No.1 (Page 56), then respondent No.1 shall take decision upon it on its own merits preferably within a period of six months.
[ ANIL S.KILOR ] [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
mta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent government is required to decide on the petition for grant of appropriate pay scale within a specified time.
KISHOR RANGANATHRAO KULKARNI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
