Petitioner sought to withdraw criminal writ petition. Single Judge disposed of the appeal as withdrawn and vacated interim orders.
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp766.18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.766/2018
Arvind Namdev Rathod .vs. Sunita Arvind Rathod
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. N. B. Rathod, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. M. N. Ali, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : MARCH 8, 2019
Mr. Rathod, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present writ petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Needless to mention that interim orders stand
vacated.
JUDGE
kahale
Arvind Namdev Rathod
Sunita Arvind Rathod
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
