The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur dismissed the criminal application on March 8, 2019, due to the applicant's counsel's persistent absence, noting a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa432.18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.432/2018
Chandranna Mallanna Gadicharla .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO P.S. Pratap Nagar, Nagpur and Ors.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : MARCH 8, 2019
Counsel for applicant as well as respondent nos.2 to 6 are absent. Learned A.P.P. for respondent no.1 is present.
Record of this proceeding shows that right from the beginning, in spite of several opportunities being given, counsel for the applicant is remaining absent. It shows that the applicant and his counsel are not having interest in prosecuting this matter.
In view of above, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
kahale
Chandranna Mallanna Gadicharla
State of Maharashtra through PSO P.S. Pratap Nagar, Nagpur
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
