Disposed

Arun Baburao Kadam and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thru Prin. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forests and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Jul 2019PIL/70/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a PIL regarding encroachment on re-vested government land in Kolhapur. The Bench directed the District Collector to ensure the eviction and demolition of unauthorized structures within six months and clarified that prior notice to encroachers is not mandatory.

What did the court decide?

The District Collector, Kolhapur was directed to ensure the removal of encroachments and demolition of unauthorized structures within six months.

Arun Baburao Kadam and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra Thru… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

PIL 70.19.doc

¶2

¶3

JPP

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 70 OF 2019

¶6

Arun Baburao Kadam and Ors. … Petitioners

¶7

V/s.

¶8

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶9

... Respondents.

¶10

Ms. Anushree Kurup I/b. Mr. Dhairyasheel Sutar for the Petitioners. Mr. P.P. Kakade, Govt. Pleader a/w. M.M. Pabale, AGP for the State.

¶11

CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.

¶12

DATE : 19 JULY 2019.

¶13

P.C. :-

¶14

The Public Interest Litigation is listed for preliminary

¶15

hearing.

¶16

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the State of Maharashtra.

¶17

For the directions we propose to issue there is no requirement to call for a counter affidavit to be filed.

¶18

2 1. PIL 70.19.doc

¶19

Case of the Petitioners is that part of land comprised in Gat No. 754/A, 754/A-1, 754/B (new C.T.S.Nos. 2611/1 to 26) is Gairan land. The portion was allotted to Medical Department Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., another portion was allotted to Public Health Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., but on account of breaches committed by the two Societies, the allotment was cancelled and the land stood restored to the Government.

¶20

In other words, the entire land referred to hereinabove re-vested in the Government.

¶21

The grievance is that individuals started encroaching upon the Gairan land and started effecting constructions. Few encroachers have approached a Civil Court.

¶22

As per the Petition a representation was made to the Collector, District Kolhapur as also the Tahsildar of the Taluka incharge but encroachments could not be removed. Probably Police assistance was not given. On 25.06.2018 the Tahsildar stayed the proposed action of eviction calling upon the encroachers to remove the unauthorized structures constructed by them within one month. It is pleaded that said month being over, the encroachers continued to occupy parts of the Gairan land and no action to remove the encroachment is being taken.

¶23

PIL 70.19.doc

¶24

¶25

Pleading that on 03.12.2018 the 1^st Petitioner gave a written representation to the Collector, District Kolhapur, grievance is that no action to free the Gairan land from encroachments is being taken.

¶26

The annexures filed with the Writ Petition support the contentions.

¶27

It is the duty of the Collector of a District to ensure that the Government land is not encroached upon and if any encroachment is detected, action to remove the encroachee has to be taken. The action has not to be by way of issuing notice to the encroachees. The action has to be by removing the encroachments and securing the land so that in future no encroachment takes place.

¶28

We dispose of the Petition directing that the Writ Petition be treated as a representation to the Collector, District Kolhapur. The District Collector, Kolhapur would ensure that the Gairan land is made free from encroachment and the unauthorized structures constructed are demolished.

¶29

Needless to state the Collector has enough power to direct the local Police Authorities to provide Police Aid in case there

¶30

PIL 70.19.doc

¶31

¶32

is resistance to the removal of encroachment.

¶33

Compliance shall be made by the District Collector, Kolhapur within six months from today.

¶34

N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Arun Baburao Kadam and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thru Prin. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forests and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Baburao Kadam and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thru Prin. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forests and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ketan Tirodkar Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary

Mr. Sapan Shrivastava Vs Tower and Infrastructure Providers Association @ Taipa and Ors.

Vinakar Foundation Pranit Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Mr. Sapan Shrivastava Vs Union of India through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Kamal Jagdish Singh Vs the Childrens Aid Society and 3 Ors.

High Court on Its Own Motion on the Report Submitted by the Registrar (Inspection-I), H.C. Bombay Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shri. Hirishikesh Arun Nazre Vs Nashik Municipal Corporation through Mun. Commissioner, City Engineer and Ors.

Nashik Nagarik Kruti Samiti Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Ketan Tirodkar Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs Jagdish Chotelal Gandhi and Anr.

Mr. Sapan Shrivastava Vs Tower and Infrastructure Providers Association @ Taipa and Ors.

Chamunda Motors and 4 Others Vs Sunder Corporation and 6 Others

Rajendra Madhukar Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Maharashtra State Primary Teachers Association Vs the Administrative Officer and Ors.