In default proceedings where the petitioner fails to appear, the High Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation.
None. PIL dismissed in absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)-PIL-66-19.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2019
Ketan Tirodkar ..Petitioner
Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
None for the Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 18th JULY, 2019
P.C.
Since none appears for the Petitioner at the hearing today, the Public Interest litigation is dismissed in default.
N. M. JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE
BGP. 1 o f 1
Ketan Tirodkar
State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
