The petitioner sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 102 of 2018. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 18 July, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 22 PIL 102 - 2018.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2018
Sapan Srivastava .. Petitioner Vs Union of India and others .. Respondents
Mr.Pandit Kasar a/w Ms.Neha Sonawane i/b Vis Legis Law Practice, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Shrinivas Bhave a/w Ms.Sunayana Kashid i/b M/s.Bhave & Co., for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M.JAMDAR, J. Date : 18 July, 2019.
P.C. :
Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest
Petition. The same is dismissed as withdrawn
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Sapan Srivastava
Union of India
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
